Original title: The Internet is the most powerful communication tool ever created
Article
Human-Centered Computing Foundation is advancing a .self top-level domain through ICANN’s Applicant Support Program to create a human-centered alternative to the current attention-driven web model. The proposal emphasizes a free, one-subdomain-per-person structure, with a stated focus on ethical, human-oriented technology and easier access for self-hosted content. Commenters generally agree the anti-abuse problem is central and argue that a fixed identity-linked registry, anti-squatting enforcement, and periodic proof of use would be required for credibility. Several suggest limiting transferability, preventing parking, and tying domains to verified identities through strong mechanisms such as passkey-linked ID proofs. Others question whether a new TLD is necessary, pointing to existing infrastructure like existing low-cost domains and even HCCF's own onmy.cloud subdomain path. Multiple participants doubt operational readiness after encountering site errors, unstable pages, and strict email-validation blocks during signup attempts. Concerns also focus on the practical definition of "self-hosted" and "ethical," the feasibility of privacy-preserving identity proofs, and how abuse prevention can avoid arbitrary takedowns. The thread repeatedly returns to economics: free or very cheap allocation could invite abuse, while higher fees undermine the initiative’s accessibility goal.
The discussion is mostly skeptical and highly technical, with users proposing mechanisms for secure identity binding, anti-squatting controls, and durable reputation systems to prevent abuse. A few comments call for deterministic naming schemes and anti-transfer rules to reduce speculation, while others reject free, user-chosen names as structurally vulnerable to squatting and phishing. Several participants suggest piloting on a subdomain of an existing domain first, citing the long history of failing new TLDs and examples such as .tk being heavily blocked after misuse. Security is a recurring theme, including fears of self-hosted exposure, attack targeting, and difficulty maintaining trust without stronger governance. Others raise concrete operational questions about pricing stability, registration flow, and whether TLD-level intervention can scale beyond current registries. A significant number of readers complain that the linked resource is unreliable or hard to use, including errors, email rejection, and poor mobile usability, which weakens confidence. The thread also contains humor and memes, from playful domain-name examples to self-referential criticism of the proposal’s timing and feasibility. Overall, commenters generally support the intent but demand clearer architecture, stricter anti-abuse design, and proof of execution before broad adoption.